We let them die, let the killers get away, then lied about what happened.

"What this means is that we have the forces in the air and on the ground to have stopped the attack at any point, eliminating the terrorists and saving American lives."

AC-130U Gunship was On-Scene in Benghazi, Obama Admin Refused to Let It Fire

Bob Owens - October 26, 2012 - 9:50 am


The AC-130U is a very effective third-generation fire-support aircraft, capable of continuous and extremely accurate fire onto multiple targets....

It was purpose-built for a select number of specific mission types, including point-defense against enemy attack. It was literally built for the kind of mission it could have engaged in over Benghazi, if the administration had let it fire. 

CIA operators were denied request for help during Benghazi attack, sources say

By Jennifer Griffin - October 26, 2012



"...an urgent request from the CIA annex for military back-up during the attack on the U.S. consulate and subsequent attack several hours later on the annex itself was denied by the CIA chain of command -- who also told the CIA operators twice to "stand down" rather than help the ambassador's team when shots were heard at approximately 9:40 p.m. in Benghazi on Sept. 11. "


Maybe there were military or diplomatic reasons to allow the attack to proceed unhindered.  But then why did Obama and his surrogates continue to claim that the problem was free speech??  This was an attack on America, entirely unrelated to some specific expression of free speech.

An American ambassador was murdered, American forces refused to intervene, and the American President went to the UN and told the world that he believes in free speech... unless it pisses off Muslims, and, therefore, though murder is terrible, the people who really need to change their ways are those that speak ill of Muhammed.

Amazing.